Revision rounds
Feedback, the response and the next version, in order. Agencies hold this in quantity and almost nobody else does, which is why it carries the most interest.
- Feedback
- Response
- Next version
- Sign-off
For agency founders and partners
License your briefs, revision rounds and timesheets to AI training-data buyers, with the client's identity taken out first. The finished work usually stays the client's. The record of how you made it is often yours.
1 Raw job record
Job 0412Spring launch page
Logged against the job69.75 h
2 Client removed
Job 0412Launch page
role_am_02Names and brand gone69.75 h kept
3 You choose the buyer
4 Paid under a license
30 days
micro1 pays the whole amount within a month of accepting the data. You license; you do not sell title.
Invented example. The client, the job and the people in step 1 are made up.
Labs training AI agents to run projects need the messy middle: the brief that changed three times, the feedback that sent a layout back, the hours logged against each task. None of the buyers asks for a portfolio.
Feedback, the response and the next version, in order. Agencies hold this in quantity and almost nobody else does, which is why it carries the most interest.
The starting intent and every dated amendment. Remove the client's name, product and anything a reader could trace back.
Hours by task, role and phase over years. Structured, usually the agency's own record, with staff names taken out.
Checklists, bug tickets and approval steps: how a team decides something is done.
Onboarding guides, SOPs and estimating templates. Plainly yours, and on micro1's published list.
Resumes, interview notes and salary expectations are personal information about candidates who never agreed to AI training. Role specs without the client, stage timings, outreach templates and screening rubrics may go, depending on your candidate privacy notice and the states you recruit in.
What a recruiting agency can licenseOwnership
Start with the MSA, not the archive. Once the invoice clears, the IP assignment clause in most agency contracts hands the finished work to whoever paid for it. Timesheets, internal QA and your own process documents are often the agency's. Some contracts define confidential information broadly enough to catch the brief itself.
Size
Nyne asks for the least: twenty W-2 employees on a US payroll and three years of trading. micro1 asks for 30 full-time staff and English-language records. Scale AI prefers 40 but judges each case. Labelbox Prism prints no size rule at all.
Buyers
All four sell training data on to AI labs. micro1 names process documentation and SOPs, Scale AI names Jira and Confluence work, Nyne names Asana and Jira projects. Mercor buys company data too, but we print nothing about its terms.
Payment timing, exclusivity and referral terms · Terms changelog
Our interest, declared: micro1 and Scale AI pay introducers, so a signed deal with either after our introduction can earn us a fee. No fee changes what we print here. Scale AI calls its range illustrative. Independent site, not affiliated with any company named.
Clients
If anything in the set came from their project, even with their name removed, the safer course is to say so. Read the confidentiality clause first: if it covers "all information relating to the project", even a de-identified brief may need consent.
The question a client asks is rarely "was it legal?" It is "why did we hear about this from someone else?"
No agency's fee is public. These are the ranges buyers advertise, and they are marketing, not offers. Until a buyer has seen a sample, a mid-sized agency's archive usually sits well below the top of any of them.
Reported, not published. Google bid $10 million for Spirit Airlines' de-identified business records, with a court still to approve it (Reuters). Labeling startups were said to be paying HVAC contractors around $150,000 each (The Information). A founder closing a crypto startup got about $25,000 for its code (MIT Technology Review).
Each figure is that company's own advertised range, and none of them is an offer. Try the worth estimate
Each buyer runs these in roughly this order. Nothing moves until you have signed.
The buyer checks size, years, country and record types against its published rules.
You agree which systems and date ranges are in. micro1 lets companies look over representative samples drawn from their records.
Scale AI strips identities on your own systems before any export and asks you to sign off each package. Elsewhere the location goes unstated.
Scope, rights, exclusivity and acceptance criteria. Labelbox Prism licenses are exclusive by default. Your own lawyer reads it.
micro1 pays the full sum within 30 days of accepting the data. Labelbox says Prism deals can go from first call to payment in under three weeks.
It can, provided every record in the deal is its own or covered by a right to license it. For most agencies that means process records (briefs stripped of client identity, revision histories, timesheets, QA checklists) rather than the finished work, which the client usually owns.
Usually not without the client agreeing. Most MSAs assign the work product to the client once the invoice is paid, so the campaign, the site build and the source files are theirs to license, not yours. Some confidentiality clauses reach the brief itself. See client-owned vs agency-owned.
Usually not. Most MSAs assign deliverables to the client on payment. What buyers want from an agency is how work got made, which is often the agency's own record.
They should not. All four promise de-identification, and Scale AI does it on your side of the fence. Even so, take out client names and personal details yourself before a sample goes anywhere; a buyer's clean-up is a backstop.
Nyne sets the lowest printed bar: a US firm, three years in business, with twenty or more W-2 employees on the payroll full time. It rises to 30 full-time staff at micro1 and a preferred 40 at Scale AI. Labelbox Prism publishes no size rule.
Nobody publishes agency deals. Buyers publish ranges (from around $50K at Labelbox Prism to $3M+ at the top of micro1's tiers), and reported deals are often far smaller. The worth estimate shows which published ranges your agency's size fits.
Candidate personal data is the hard part: resumes, contact details and interview notes are personal information about people who agreed to be considered for a job, not to train a model. The process with the people taken out can sometimes go. See recruiting agency data for what can and cannot.
Describe the agency and where its history is kept, in a few lines. Your answers get compared with what each buyer says it requires, and the email back names any that match. No buyer hears of you until you agree.
Keep records, files, samples and client names out of this form. A description of what the agency holds is plenty.
Sell Agency Data makes introductions, and a buyer you choose to work with may pay us for that.